The City Council met in regular session on October 30, 2000, in City
Council Chambers. A quorum being
present, Mayor Cleveland L. Rippons called the meeting to order at 7:00
p.m. Those Commissioners in attendance
were Commissioners Bohlen, Watkins, Weldon, Atkinson and Travers.
Mr.
Kinnamon led in the Lord’s Prayer.
Commissioner Atkinson led in the Pledge of Allegiance. The minutes of the October 23, 2000 meeting
were approved as distributed.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
|
Municipal Utilities Commission -- Mayor Rippons reported that present
water rates have been in effect since July 1998. While the distribution system is in fairly good shape, there
are pipes in place that are well over 100 years old. The entire system needs to be maintained
and future growth must be considered.
At their meeting last week, the MUC Board voted unanimously to request
the City Council to increase the out-of-City surcharge from 50 percent
(where it currently stands) to 100 percent effective January 1, 2001. This is what most municipalities charge
customers outside city limits. A vote
will be taken by City Council next week. Planning & Zoning -- Commissioner Watkins
reported that Ron Berman withdrew his request for a special use permit. Other issues discussed were: §
Clifton Enterprises—The Commission recommended that Clifton
Enterprises’ request to annex a portion of land on Chesapeake Drive into the
City be approved. Commissioner
Watkins made a motion to set up a public hearing to review this request. The motion was passed unanimously. §
Shahbaz Azam of 603 Meteor Avenue requested to upgrade his current
special use permit from off sale beer and wine to off sale beer, wine, and
liquor. Commissioner Watkins made a
motion to accept the Commission’s recommendation to set up a public hearing
to review this request. The motion
was passed unanimously. §
Proposed Text Amendment/Section 20-16 “Special Use”—The Commission
recommended that Council approve the proposed text amendment to allow the
Board of Appeals to grant “special uses” or “special exceptions” instead of
the Commissioners of Cambridge. However, they felt the Board Members should
be appointed by the Mayor and Commissioners, not solely by the Mayor. §
Review of the Revised Sign Ordinance—The Commission recommended that
Council approve the revised draft sign ordinance. |
|
Nelson
Stewart Representing Millennium Community Development Company, LLC—The Company would like to work with the County in constructing homes
because the entire County is a HUB Zone (low income and/or high unemployment
areas). The City, being part of the
County, is also a HUB Zone. The
Secretary of the Department of Housing & Community Development (DHCD)
will let Mr. Stewart know what funds are available to the City for the
construction of homes. The homes
could be single homes, town homes, whatever the City is interested in. They could be owner-occupied or rental
properties. According to Mr. Steward,
DHCD says they have funds to assist the City in the development of these
homes. Mr. Stewart stated that he has
worked with several companies and can build houses which would meet the price
that individuals here could afford.
An organization called Affordable Housing works with individuals who
have low income. Mr. Stewart has
looked at various locations but would like to find out exactly where the City
would like to have these homes built.
They will work in conjunction with the City on their desired
locations. At the Mayor’s suggestion,
a public meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, November 9, 2000 at
7:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers.
The company will be available at 6:30 p.m. to talk to citizens
before the meeting. |
|
Public
Comment – Proposed Sign Ordinance—The advertisement of
public hearing was published in the Daily Banner on October 13 and
October 20, 2000. The
consultants (Redmond Johnston) have re-drafted the sign ordinance after the
last public meeting. Mr. Johnston made a presentation on the current draft
ordinance. This draft was revised as
a result of the comments made by the Planning Commission and model sign
ordinances that have been prepared by the American Planning Association. This ordinance is legally defensible. The
first ordinance was a content-oriented ordinance. There is no special category of signs (i.e., real estate,
construction, political, etc.).
Enforcement and administration of the ordinance has been
included. Most of the requirements
are in tabular form for ease in telling whether a proposed sign is permitted,
whether it requires a permit, or whether it is not permitted. Another table tells maximum square footage
for a freestanding sign or a flat sign or other various types of signs. This makes it simpler for someone to
determine the type, area, and characteristics (lighting, location, height,
etc.) of permitted signs. The
ordinance provides that non-conforming signs must be brought into compliance
within a period of time (3 years from time ordinance is adopted). The ordinance is easy to enforce and
administer because there is a requirement for a permit and a master sign
permit for each property. In the
master sign permit the applicant will list all their signs and their
locations. It is recommended that all
permitted signs have a City-issued sticker attached to them. Sign permits should be renewed annually. A provision is made for shopping centers
that require a uniform sign format throughout the entire shopping
center. This provision allows a
25 percent increase in the base amount of signage they can have which is
an incentive for a coordinated sign program.
Within this sign ordinance, the numbers (square footage) become a
matter of local preference. Wall sign
requirements are dealt with as a percentage of the wall area. There are no provisions for variances
under the ordinance. The intent of the
ordinance is to get rid of all non-conforming signs. The length of time to bring all signs into
conformance is not “carved in stone”.
The number suggested is 3 years but this can be extended to 5 or 10
years. The Historic Preservation
Commission must review all signs within the Historic District. All signs are addressed by the ordinance
but not all signs require permits. Mayor Rippons announced that a work
session will be set up to answer questions.
Council will not even consider voting on the ordinance until they have
listened to the citizens. Written
questions or concerns on the proposed ordinance can be sent to City
Hall. They will be forwarded to the
consultant prior to the public work session. |
|
Bid Opening – Installation of Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk for
Designated Areas of Henry Street and Dorchester Avenue—No bids were
received. An alternate plan will be
discussed at a later date. |
|
Bid Opening – Construction of Brick Walkways –
Pine Street Empowerment Center—No bids were received. An alternate plan will be
discussed at a later date. |
|
Decision of Amending Section 20-16 of the City
Code Making the Board of Appeals the Official Body That Would Decide All
Issues Regarding Special Uses or Special Exceptions—The public hearing was
held on October 23, 2000.
Commissioner Weldon made a motion to amend Section 20-16 of the City
Code Making the Board of Appeals the Official Body That Would Decide All
Issues Regarding Special Uses and Special Exceptions. The motion was passed unanimously. |
Vote on Matching Funds for Race Street Pedestrian Mall—Mr. Collison stated that after reviewing the
Meeting Minutes (March 27, 2000 and May 22, 2000) the match was to be a
50 percent match; that is, 50 percent of what the individual raised
(not to exceed $2000). This is a
budgetary matter. If the Council was
so inclined and wanted to exceed this amount, they obviously could do so
based on a budget amendment.
Commissioner Weldon made a motion to fund the project to the maximum
allocation of $2000. The motion was
passed unanimously.
|
|
Award Bid for Playground Equipment at Great Marsh Park—One bid was received
from West Recreation, Inc. The price
fell within the area expected. The
Department of Public Works has $20,200 budgeted for this equipment. The bid received was for $20,832. The Department of Natural Resources will
refund 75 percent of this amount.
Commissioner Atkinson made a motion to accept the recommendation of
the Department of Public Works to award the bid to West Recreation. The motion was passed unanimously. |
|
Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of a Special Use Permit for a Day
Care Center (Bonita Green, 1404 Stone Boundary Road)—Commissioner Travers
made a motion to approve the resolution authorizing the issuance of a Special
Use Permit for a Day Care Center for Bonita Green. The motion was passed unanimously. |
|
Request from G. Philip Reed to be Referred to the Traffic and Safety
Committee
(re: Bayly Road)—Commissioner made a
request to send the request to Traffic and Safety. The motion was passed unanimously. |
|
Request to Go to Bid – Furnishing and Delivering
One New 2000/ 2001 Rear End Garbage Packer—The Department of Public Works budgeted
$110,000 for a new trash truck this year.
The price of a new truck will be $80,000. This was not an intentional over-budget. They were originally considering a tandem
truck. After careful evaluation, they
feel the tandem truck is too large for most of the City streets. The Department of Public Works would like
to use a portion of the remainder to go to bid for a much-needed pick-up
truck. Commissioner Atkinson made a
motion to go to bid for both items (trash truck and pick-up truck). They will
be separate and unique bids. The
motion was passed unanimously. |
|
Request to Go to Bid – Furnishing and Delivering
One New Rotary Screw Portable Air Compressor—Commissioner Atkinson
made a motion to go to bid for a new rotary screw portable air compressor
which is a budgeted item. The motion
was passed unanimously. |
|
Approve Financial Statement for September 2000—Commissioner Travers
made a motion to approve the financial statement for September 2000. The motion was passed unanimously. |
|
Budget Amendment for Housing Department—Commissioner Travers
made a motion to approve the budget amendment for the Housing Department. |
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
After reviewing the bids for the pavilion at Great
Marsh, all of which came in over budget, David Pritchett recommended to Council
that they re-bid the pavilion. There
will be two phases to the bid—one for materials and one for installation.
Commissioner Travers made a motion to re-bid for the pavilion. The motion was passed unanimously.
Mayor
Rippons requested that the next work session (November 20 at
7:00 p.m.) be held at the Elks Lodge on Pine Street to receive input from
the Community on what they would like to see as the functions of the
Empowerment Center, which is due to open February 2001.
The Mayor announced that he has some personnel and
pending litigation matters to discuss with the Council. Commissioner Atkinson made a motion to go
into Executive Session after the meeting.
The motion was passed unanimously.
Commissioner Weldon announced an informational
meeting on November 8 at 6:00 p.m. at the Elks Lodge on Pine Street
to discuss the Main Street Maryland Program.
Cindy Stone from the Maryland Department of Housing and Community
Development will discuss the program. This
is an open public forum.
Commissioner Weldon also announced a “Light Up Cambridge”
meeting on November 1 at 6:00 p.m. at the Chamber of Commerce. He
then announced a Waterfront Development meeting on November 1 at City Council
Chambers beginning at 7:00 p.m.
With
no further business, Mayor Rippons adjourned this portion of the meeting at
8:25 p.m.
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and
accurate account of the Council meeting Monday, October 30, 2000, insofar as I
personally am aware.
Edwin
C. Kinnamon
Clerk-Treasurer
Return to the City Council Minutes Page

Return to City of Cambridge Web Page